Trunk comparison: Renault Clio vs VW Tiguan Allspace

Key Differences

The VW Tiguan Allspace offers a significantly longer cargo area with the seats folded down: +22.8 in (44%) compared to the Renault Clio.

Even with the first row of seats upright, the Tiguan is +16.1 in (58%) longer. Conversely, the Renault Clio has a larger trunk with all seats upright: +9.4 in (51%) longer usable length than the Tiguan.

The depth of the trunk (loading edge to trunk floor) is significantly greater in the Clio: +30.3 in (7600%). The loading edge of the Tiguan sits much higher above the road: +20.9 in (221%) compared to the Clio. The width of the trunk opening is +5.5 in (14%) larger in the Tiguan.

Impact on Usability

For long or bulky items (boards, furniture, long boxes), the Tiguan Allspace is clearly advantageous: the greater loading length with folded seats and the wider trunk opening make loading and maneuvering long cargo easier.

Even when the first row of seats remains upright, the Tiguan offers more length, making it more flexible for longer items without folding seats down.

The Renault Clio scores in everyday use with more cargo space when the rear seats are upright and a significantly lower loading edge height. The lower loading level makes it easier to load groceries, suitcases, and child seats.

The very large trunk depth also means more "volume downward" – useful for tall or stackable cargo that fits below the loading edge. However, loading heavy items may require more lifting and reaching into the interior due to the deep cargo floor.

In summary: Those who frequently transport long or bulky items and value flexibility with folded seats are better served by the Tiguan Allspace. Those who more often drive with rear seats upright, prefer a low loading edge and deep cargo space for everyday transport, benefit more from the Renault Clio.