Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Volvo XC40 vs VW Tiguan Allspace

Trunk comparison: Volvo XC40 vs VW Tiguan Allspace

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Volvo XC40 and VW Tiguan Allspace
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Volvo XC40 and VW Tiguan Allspace

Key Differences

The VW Tiguan Allspace has a cargo floor that is 8.7 in (13%) longer with the seats folded down than the Volvo XC40, and also a 8.3 in (23%) longer cargo length with the first row of seats upright.

In contrast, the Volvo XC40 offers a trunk area that is 17.3 in (94%) larger than the Tiguan Allspace when all seats are in use. All other measurements differ only slightly (e.g., opening height +0.4 in, loading height +0.8 in, opening width +3.1 in) or are the same (depth from loading edge sill to trunk floor).

Implications for Usability

For transporting long items or large, flat cargo, the Tiguan Allspace is clearly advantageous: the longer cargo floor with folded seats (13%) and the greater cargo length in the described seating configuration (23%) make it easier to load furniture, slats, boards, or longer sports equipment.

The slightly wider trunk opening of the Tiguan (+3.1 in) supports loading wider items but has only a moderate effect.

The Volvo XC40, on the other hand, scores significantly when all seats are occupied: with nearly double the cargo area (94%) behind the seats, it is better suited for family use with luggage, strollers, or shopping when fully occupied.

The practically identical floor depth means the usable volume in depth is comparable; the slightly lower loading edge of the Volvo makes lifting heavy items a bit easier.

Conclusion: Those who frequently travel with full occupancy and luggage benefit from the Volvo XC40. Those who regularly transport long or highly variable cargo and need to fold seats down are better served by the Tiguan Allspace.