Trunk comparison: VW Touran vs Durchschnitt Subcompact
Loading Lengths and Flexibility
The VW Touran offers +20.1 in (40%) more loading length with folded seats than the average subcompact.
This makes the Touran significantly more suitable for long items (e.g., furniture, slats, skis) or bulky transports when the rear seats are not needed. Even with the first row of seats upright, the Touran is +15 in (60%) longer, meaning it provides more cargo space even when some seats are in use.
Conversely, the average subcompact has +11.4 in (85%) more trunk space with all seats upright than the Touran; this suggests that the subcompact offers more usable storage space behind the rear seats when fully occupied (suitcases, groceries for multiple people).
Loading Height, Depth, and Handling
The depth of the trunk (loading edge to floor) of the average subcompact is +7.1 in (1800%) greater than that of the Touran.
Practically, this means the trunk floor in the subcompact sits significantly lower below the loading edge, which can increase volume in the deep area but also means items lie deeper in the trunk.
Together with the fact that the loading edge of the subcompact is +4.3 in (18%) higher above the road, the subcompact has a higher threshold and requires more lifting effort when loading larger or heavier items. The Touran has the advantage here with a lower loading edge, making loading easier.
Width and Opening
The width of the VW Touran's trunk opening is +5.1 in (14%) larger than that of the average subcompact. A larger opening facilitates loading wider or bulkier items (e.g., strollers, furniture parts).
The width at the narrowest point is only slightly better in the Touran (+2.8 in / 7%) and thus not a significant difference.
Conclusion: What Are the Practical Implications of These Differences?
- For users who frequently transport long or bulky loads (crafts, sports equipment, furniture moves), the VW Touran is clearly advantageous: more loading length with folded seats, larger opening, and lower loading edge make loading easier and allow for larger, longer items. - For users who regularly travel with full passenger capacity and want to store luggage behind the rear seats, the average subcompact may be more advantageous because it offers more usable depth/space with seats upright. - Those who value easy and ergonomic loading (less lifting effort) benefit from the Touran; those who prefer volume under the loading edge and a deeper loading floor will find that more in the subcompact but must accept a higher loading edge and more difficult access.