Trunk comparison: VW Touran vs Durchschnitt Wagon

Key Differences

Most differences are minor (1–9%). Only two values stand out, exceeding 10% significantly:

The average wagon offers a trunk that is 26 in (+194%) larger with the rear seats upright than the VW Touran.

The trunk depth (loading edge → trunk floor) of the average wagon is 1.2 in (+300%) greater than that of the VW Touran. (Note: in absolute terms, this is only 1.2 in.)

Impact on Usability

Everyday use: Due to the significantly larger trunk with the rear seats upright, the average wagon is better suited for shopping, strollers, or luggage when the seats are not folded down. This means more usable space without changing the seat configuration.

Transporting long items: When all seats are folded down, the VW Touran is marginally longer (+2.4 in / 3%), providing slightly more cargo length for longer items — but the advantage is small and often negligible in practice.

Depth and stacking: The greater depth of the average wagon (1.2 in, percentage-wise very high) offers slightly more space between the loading edge and floor, which minimally facilitates placing flat or stackable loads; however, since the absolute difference is small, the practical effect is limited.

Loading opening and width: The width of the trunk opening is the same, with the narrowest width being only 0.4 in wider on the Touran. The height of the opening and loading edge height differ only slightly. Consequently, large or bulky items can be loaded similarly well in both vehicles.

Conclusion

For users who frequently need a lot of volume with the rear seats upright (shopping, family daily use), the average wagon is clearly more practical. The Touran offers slightly more length with folded seats; otherwise, the practical differences are minor.