Trunk comparison: Ford Escape vs Mazda Mazda CX-5

Overview of Differences

The dimensions of both models are similar, with small advantages on both sides: The Ford Kuga offers a 1.2 in (2%) longer cargo floor length with the seats folded down and 0.8 in (2%) more length with the first row upright.

The Mazda CX‑5 has a 1.2 in (4%) higher trunk opening, a 2.4 in (9%) higher load lip above the road, and 0.4 in (1%) more width at the narrowest point. The opening width of the trunk is the same on both models.

Most Noticeable Difference

The depth of the trunk (distance from load lip to trunk floor) is 1.6 in (+400%) greater in the Mazda CX‑5 than in the Ford Kuga. This difference is significantly more pronounced than any other deviation.

Impact on Usability

The significantly greater trunk depth of the Mazda practically means more usable vertical/interior space directly behind the load lip: when transporting tall or bulky items (boxes, equipment, plants), more can be accommodated, items can be stacked higher, and bulky cargo fits more easily without tilting.

This increases everyday practicality for users who frequently or irregularly transport tall loads.

Conversely, the 2.4 in higher load lip of the Mazda negatively affects lifting heavy items: lifting from the ground into the trunk requires more effort or a ramp. The slightly higher trunk opening (+1.2 in) makes inserting tall items easier but does not fully compensate for the higher load lip.

The slight length advantages of the Ford Kuga (±2–1.2 in) are noticeable for very long, flat items but remain minor and only minimally affect everyday usability. The Mazda’s 0.4 in greater narrowest width is also negligible.

Conclusion

For users who frequently transport tall or bulky cargo, the Mazda CX‑5 offers the greatest practical advantage due to its significantly greater trunk depth.

Those who often load heavy items alone might find the lower load lip of the Ford Kuga more comfortable. For normal everyday use, the models are largely comparable.