Trunk Dimensions

Home » Comparisons » Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs VW Touran

Trunk comparison: Mazda Mazda CX-5 vs VW Touran

Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Mazda Mazda CX-5 and VW Touran
Comparison of trunk dimensions for the Mazda Mazda CX-5 and VW Touran

Clear Difference 1: Trunk Length with Seats Upright (Mazda Significantly Larger)

The Mazda CX‑5 offers a trunk that is 24.4 in (182%) longer with all seats upright compared to the VW Touran. Practically, this means: with full occupancy, the CX‑5 can transport significantly longer items (skis, long boxes, slats, pipes) without folding down seats. For users who regularly need to carry long cargo with passengers, the CX‑5 is therefore clearly more suitable.

Clear Difference 2: Trunk Depth (Loading Edge → Trunk Floor) — Mazda Significantly Deeper

The depth from the loading edge to the trunk floor is 1.6 in (400%) greater in the Mazda. Practical consequence: the CX‑5 has a noticeably deeper cargo area, allowing luggage to be stored further down and remain better seated in the well (less shifting, more usable volume for tall items). However, a deeper floor combined with a high loading lid increases the effective height inside the cargo area.

Clear Difference 3: Loading Edge Height Above the Road — Mazda Significantly Higher

The loading edge of the CX‑5 is about 5.5 in (23%) higher above the road than that of the Touran. This means: lifting heavy or bulky loads into the CX‑5 requires more effort (greater lever distance), while the Touran’s lower loading edge allows easier, more back-friendly loading. The combination of a high loading edge and deep trunk well in the CX‑5 means more volume but less comfort when lifting.

In Short: What Are the Consequences?

- If you frequently transport long items without folding seats (e.g., with passengers), the Mazda is clearly advantageous. - If you often load/unload heavy or bulky items and need a back-friendly solution, the VW Touran with its lower loading edge is more practical. - The deeper floor of the Mazda increases usable volume and luggage security but makes lifting heavy loads less convenient.

Other, Less Relevant Differences (<=10%)

Narrowest width: equal. Trunk opening width: Mazda +0.8 in (2%) — negligible. Trunk length with seats folded: Touran +3.5 in (5%) — minor. Trunk opening height: Touran +2.8 in (9%) — just below the 10% threshold and usually insignificant for usability in practice.